.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

multi monitor wallpaper

multi monitor wallpaper. Advanced Multi-Monitor Taskbar
  • Advanced Multi-Monitor Taskbar



  • Loge
    Oct 26, 12:30 PM
    Just got my family pack plus t-shirt from Regent Street. I got in the queue at 4.40.





    multi monitor wallpaper. Free Military Multi Monitor
  • Free Military Multi Monitor



  • Kuwait-Mac
    Dec 5, 02:52 PM
    God !! .. I Stell Want One .. Even If Costs 600 $ .. Don't Care For The Price .. I Want Me iPhone 4 To Be White !





    multi monitor wallpaper. Multi-monitor Screensavers:
  • Multi-monitor Screensavers:



  • bella92108
    Apr 1, 01:40 PM
    What they do in other countries has nothing to do with how they would do it in the USA. Do you seriously think the cable companies would introduce a choice where they stand to lose money? There's no way, unless the FCC forced them, that this would happen.

    Also, $1/channel is way too low. Just because you can get 10 channels for $60, doesn't mean each channel would be priced at 60 cents. IIRC, a popular channel like ESPN costs the cable provider $4/subscriber ... and that's with Disney forcing the whole ABC/ESPN/Disney package of channels onto the cable co.

    If ALC does happen, I would guess that most people would pay the same or more than they currently do. A small percentage may pay less, but it really depends on what channels they pick (and whether those channels survive).

    It's a con when channels that focus on specific programming are forced to close up or offer the same old crap that everyone else does. For instance, a channel like BET may not survive to provide focused programming to the African American community because they would likely lose over half their subscriber base.

    This isn't the goal of diverse television programming. Take a look at Obama's position on ALC. This is what I'm referring to.

    As for letting the less popular networks whither, I do see this as a con. Networks will need to appeal to a broader audience in order to compete. Get ready for 15 channels showing the same formuliac sitcom. 20 channels of reality TV shows. 10 channels of daytime/social talk shows. 15 channels of sports. And 13 channels of news. No room for channels like History Channel or Discovery Health ... as they'll morph into a TNT or SpikeTV.

    So I pay $60 a month and get all of the channels you mentioned above:

    SpikeTV - Unsubscribe Please
    TNT - Unsubscribe Please
    History Channel - Unsubscribe Please
    Discovery Health - Unsubscribe Please
    BET - Unsubscribe Please
    ESPN - Unsubscribe Please
    ABC Family - Unsubscribe Please
    Disney - Unsubscribe Please


    I'll take:

    Discovery
    TBS
    Comedy Central
    A&E
    CNN
    HGTV

    I'd gladly pay $5 per channel knowing those channels are supported and any funding is stripped from the others. That'd half my monthly bill, and $5 a channel is more than fair, right?

    If the others can't appeal to their subscribers, bye bye crap channels.

    But PS - All of the above is utterly irrelevant. These cable channels are ADVERTISEMENT supported, like newspapers, NOT subscription supported.... so they'd fail because they could no longer sell false numbers of "potential viewers" anymore, so they'd fail because they suck, not because they don't make money from subscribers.





    multi monitor wallpaper. MultiMonitor 4:3: 3200x1200
  • MultiMonitor 4:3: 3200x1200



  • crazy dave
    Apr 5, 05:41 PM
    The problem with CR's iPhone 4 report was not that they didn't recommend the iPhone 4 when it originally came out on AT&T but that they then reiterated their "Not recommend" labeling for the Verizon iPhone 4 for having the same 'death grip' issue. They did this despite that the Verizon version had a different antenna design. Anandtech, who were amongst the first to quantify the 'death grip' issue for the AT&T version, showed that in fact the VZ iPhone 4 fared no worse than other smartphones. For the original iPhone 4, CR felt while it was great in many categories, it's antenna issue was too great a problem in their eyes. One could argue that they overstated the problem given that most users didn't seem to mind, but their position of "Not recommended" is not unjustifiable for the AT&T iPhone 4. However, CR clearly screwed up on the VZ iPhone 4.

    http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/03/technology/verizon_iphone/index.htm
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/4163/verizon-iphone-4-review/



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. Free Animal Multi Monitor (3)
  • Free Animal Multi Monitor (3)



  • QuantumLo0p
    Nov 21, 06:22 PM
    "If you're in a warm room, for instance, you'll have much lower performance, since it requires the differential to work. Of course, maybe the information available isn't wholly accurate, but that's my understanding based on the description."

    If the chip operates at a relatively high temperature a differential shouldn't be hard to reach. For example, with the cell operating at 600 degrees there is not much of a differential change between room temperature and plus/minus 10 degrees.

    The article hinted at efficiency between twenty to thirty percent. Wow. This would be a huge leap above thermocouple efficiency, such as in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG's), which supposedly are only three to seven percent efficient.

    The applications for this are huge and heat sources are readily available. I, for one, would prefer an alcohol powered cell over a RTG in my computer any day. That whole radiation poisoning thing could ruin my bowling average.





    multi monitor wallpaper. Free Space Multi Monitor (20)
  • Free Space Multi Monitor (20)



  • floatingspirit
    May 8, 02:36 PM
    The thing is that OS X uses OpenGl, where Windows uses DirectX. I'd agree with you, but I'd prefer running in OS X vs rebooting and my macbook running hotter. Plus while in the b.net menus, I can resize with apple + m, and open safari real quick, yet still be in the game. Plus, even on low, the game still looks pretty cool in my opinion.

    Why do u need safari while you're in a game? Looking up a useful hack? ;)



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. Free Abstract Multi Monitor
  • Free Abstract Multi Monitor



  • johnnystorm
    Jan 6, 08:48 AM
    As a long term Garmin user I cringed when they tried doing the phone thing with Asus, this doesnt fill me with any confidence either.

    As mentioned above, signal where I am in the UK is just too patchy to rely on, or indeed fast enough (even when signal is good).

    When iPhones only had 4/8gb storage then it kind of makes sense but as later models are all 16gb+ whats the big deal?

    I like to holiday in the US, often driving long distances. OTA maps would cost me a fortune in roaming fees, if indeed I got signal out in the sticks.

    For me buying copilot outright (�25/$40) for the UK and (�10/$15) USA (Thanks Black friday sales!) made a lot more sense and a fixed budget. I get quarterly updates too so I'm never that out of date!

    Before NDrive were given the boot I recall I got their USA/Canada maps for about $5 all in. Unless you really need all the available space for music/games/etc why would you want to risk it all on the chance of a good signal?





    multi monitor wallpaper. Free Comic Multi Monitor (6)
  • Free Comic Multi Monitor (6)



  • citizenzen
    Apr 9, 11:43 PM
    I call fake photo.

    It's always interesting to be exposed to a slice of history that had been up to now unknown to me. Margaret Sanger did in fact give a speech to the wives of the KKK in 1926. Here is her account (http://www.thefreshfacts.com/margaret-sangers-account-of-her-lecture-to-the-ku-klux-klan-educational-video-film-2/) of that evening from her autobiography ...



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. 70+ Beautiful Dual Screen
  • 70+ Beautiful Dual Screen



  • iPhil
    Oct 23, 06:59 PM
    Is it confirmed that we get the Leopard before Americans? I know we pay more(!) but I don't want to turn up and find I have to wait around till 6pm USA time.

    it's 6pm local time on friday. 10/26/07





    multi monitor wallpaper. wallpapers - Multi monitor
  • wallpapers - Multi monitor



  • bigsexyy81
    Aug 19, 01:16 PM
    It isn't putting Facebook back on when I sync. Is there something I need to do before the sync? :confused:



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. Multi Monitor Background
  • Multi Monitor Background



  • Darth.Titan
    Apr 18, 02:15 PM
    You might get $40 for it. The shells do make pretty good aquariums after all. :D





    multi monitor wallpaper. dual display wallpaper.
  • dual display wallpaper.



  • IntelliUser
    May 2, 12:42 PM
    Martyr.



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. London Multi Monitor Wallpaper
  • London Multi Monitor Wallpaper



  • CaoCao
    Apr 8, 03:37 AM
    They'll just have to burn replicas of the Xoom.

    The point is to honor ancestors not giving them crap you don't want





    multi monitor wallpaper. We showcased animals hd wallpapers last month and today we bring you amazing widescreen wallpapers for your dual monitor desktop (multi display) to spice up
  • We showcased animals hd wallpapers last month and today we bring you amazing widescreen wallpapers for your dual monitor desktop (multi display) to spice up



  • CubaTBird
    Sep 18, 09:33 PM
    lol, this thread is hilarious. how about as she's walking back just lightly step up your pace and que your right arm in the air and say "miss.. yes miss?! i would like your help" then she has to help you.. and then be all like, "now see im sick of these silly games with you running the back b/c you think im stalking you so why don't we just go out eh? i mean when it comes down to it, this whole situation with you going to the back of the store everytime i come in is pretty hilarious, don't you think?" then hope for the best i guess haha :p



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. Brink Dual Monitor Wallpaper #
  • Brink Dual Monitor Wallpaper #



  • yankintx
    Nov 18, 07:02 AM
    So a 17 year old can do it but a gigantic company with $50 billion lying there can't. Seems logical to me. :rolleyes:

    Wake up Steve. Seriously.

    Don't fault apple for insisting that the white iPhone parts match perfectly.
    You can bet that if the suppliers could make parts to apples standards, then apple would sell white iPhone.
    If someone does a conversion and then has minor issues such as light leak and parts not matching 100%, they will most likely put up wih it.

    If apple sold white iphones with the same issues, it would be a disaster and a public relations nightmare. So many people who read these forums complain about things so minor, and yet they will put second rate parts on their iPhones and be happy with them.
    I don't blame apple one bit for scrubbing the white iPhone.

    Go figure!





    multi monitor wallpaper. dual-flat-screen monitors
  • dual-flat-screen monitors



  • robfromabove
    Mar 24, 01:51 AM
    Maj. Gen. Nick Justice


    ...c'mon, this can't be a real story... This sounds like the plot to the new G.I. Joe sequel... :p



    more...


    multi monitor wallpaper. multi-monitor wallpaper
  • multi-monitor wallpaper



  • BC2009
    May 2, 01:17 PM
    I think that no other company has their products come under more scrutiny than Apple. It is amazing. When folks say how the media just falls over Apple and praises them constantly -- it cracks me up. The media is just itching for bad news on Apple, and they are looking in every possible place to find it.

    What shocks me is the level of forgiveness that competing tablets against the iPad are getting. Apple is so dominating the tablet-computing sector right now, that the media is just hoping for a contender. Motorola and RIM have both released "Beta Hardware (http://technologizer.com/2011/04/21/the-era-of-beta-hardware/)" to the public and many reviewers are being soft on RIM with even more being soft on Motorola. If Apple released such a product they would get blasted in the media with nobody offering forgiveness.

    Case and point... Mossberg on the iPad 2:

    "Also, the battery life, while very good, isn�t as strong as I found it to be on the first iPad. In my tough battery test, where I played full-length movies until the battery died, with the screen brightness at about 75% and both Wi-Fi and cellular radios running, the iPad 2 just barely exceeded Apple�s claimed battery life, dying after 10 hours and nine minutes."

    Keep in mind that Apple advertises 10 hours and Mossberg got better than that with the brightness setting 25% higher than Apple's default setting. Yet he had to reach to find something to complain about (e.g.: his iPad 1 test unit just happened to have extraordinary battery life -- keep in mind that most reviewers of iPad 2 got better battery life than iPad 1).

    Gruber criticizes Mossberg even more in a post called "Bending Over Backwards" (http://daringfireball.net/2011/03/bending_over_backwards). Some of Gruber's points are arguable, but I think he is dead-on in many regards, especially his final quote:

    "Stating the plain truth, that the iPad 2 has no serious competition as a mainstream consumer device, doesn�t make you biased. It makes you accurate."

    Apple, however, does not get to enjoy the luxury of forgiveness that the media affords to those who are not the market leader. The fact that folks are trying to quantify a thickness difference of 0.2 mm on some units, completely amazes me. I'm sure its within manufacturing specifications and I'm sure that not every single Black iPhone 4 is the same thickness, and yet it is news.





    multi monitor wallpaper. Res Dual Monitor Wallpaper
  • Res Dual Monitor Wallpaper



  • Blue Velvet
    Oct 17, 03:44 PM
    I will probably be there at 4pm or so... although that depends on some other factors out of my control. Anyone else planning to be there next Friday?





    multi monitor wallpaper. Multi Monitor - Sci Fi
  • Multi Monitor - Sci Fi



  • Digidesign
    Sep 19, 05:10 PM
    That's really interesting! You just held "c" at boot to load up the XP CD?

    I'm guessing you still needed to use a "slipstreamed" XP SP2 CD with the SATA drivers installed so it doesn't run in dog slow PIO mode

    Where the hell did you find chipset drivers, graphics card drivers, sound card drivers etc? :confused:

    Clarification:
    I made a MacPro driver CD from Bootcamp, and a slipstreamed XP SP2 CD. The slipstreamed XP SP2 CD boots up just fine holding "c" at boot.





    hailst0rm
    Jan 6, 04:10 PM
    I had to delete the Facebook app and reinstall for the push notification options to come up on my phone. Did try restarting the phone before that but made little difference.





    dampfnudel
    Apr 21, 01:58 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Did Apple do this last year? If not, this could mean Apple really wants developers to give users who purchase the next iPhone an enhanced experience over iPhone 4 users. What that enhanced experience is remains to be seen. Maybe 1GB of ram and something else that will make some iPhone 4 users jealous, especially when their iPhone 4 turns into an iPhone 3G someday.





    yorkshire
    Dec 16, 03:53 PM
    This is absolutely pointless and I'm sick of hearing about it. I wouldn't be surprised if it was Sony who started the campaign. Think about it. If you didn't like the X Factor song, you wouldn't buy it. But now there is this silly campaign to buy the RATM song for all the people who hate the X Factor song. Sony wins in either case.

    And the reason the X Factor song is usually number one is because, well, the X Factor is popular.

    These campaigns are stupid and pointless.


    [/thread]

    It's not about making Sony lose out. Most of the people buying the single realise that either way, Sony benefits. Yes, Cowell will benefit slightly as he has shares in Sony, but he won't benefit nearly as much as he would if X Factor was number 1. I think it's just that people are fed up of X Factor dominating the charts year after year, and they want to see something new. Myself, I don't mind the RATM song, yes if it was my choice I'd have picked another, but anything is better than the cheesy manufactured pop that comes from Reality TV singing competitions.





    elusion
    May 4, 07:55 AM
    I am a very new mac user, having just switched in February with the purchase of my iBook. I'm 17 and have been using computers since I was like 6. I remember DOS, Apple IIes, Windows 3.1/95/98/ME/NT, Mac 8. I also spent a year using linux (Mandrake, Redhat, Debian) before going to a mac. I hate PCs.

    You ask about hardware. That's not why I switched, though it was a nice bonus. I switched because of OS X.

    I always use to be a Windows guy, from a Windows family. My brother's a MCSE. The previous experience I had with Apple was horrible. We had Apple's in our school computer lab, and they were crap. Nothing worked. Now I know that they weren't multitasking. I hated them with a passion and said I'd never use one.

    Oh how things have changed. PCs have become the pieces of crap. Windows may be getting better with XP, but it's a different experience. Everything is just better with a Mac. Things just work, right away. I haven't used XP much, but I can tell you it doesn't work like this does.

    Windows' interface sucks. Really it does. I'm sure you think the interface in MacOS X is horrible. It's not, it's different. And, it's better. It's easier just use, just because of the interface.

    Windows' filesystem sucks. Unix machines have a much better filesystem -- none of the drive crap.

    Windows software sucks. There is much less software for OS X than there is for XP. No one can deny that. Fortunately, the software for OS X is usually of a very high quality. It's very well designed and stable.

    Windows' interoperability sucks. Windows runs on a huge variety of hardware, but that's noticible from the software. OS X just detects and sets up -- no wizards.

    Really I don't expect you to believe this or anything. Maybe you will if you try using one. Things are going to be different for you because you use computers primarily for gaming. Maybe someday you'll end up switching to Linux because you don't like Windows. If you do, I almost guarentee you'll switch to Mac, because Linux's a pain to set up.

    Oh, and getting away from Microsoft was good too. They are evil. Apple has potential to start a monopoly and become evil, but that's besides the point. Microsoft is doing things that are bad for the consumer. Wait and see.





    farmboy
    Mar 25, 10:15 AM
    Second that. There's a niche market (I think) amongst a few for film. Unfortunately, its become really expensive proposition. Even if you pay $2 for a roll and $10 for developing/processing, its crazy expensive compared to digital. If they could some how make it cheaper it could be successful.

    I have a couple of horses I could sell you for your buggy. You yourself have in one short paragraph identified why film is gone and ain't comin' back.