.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

small cross tattoos

images Maltese Cross Tattoos small cross tattoos. small cross tattoos on foot.
  • small cross tattoos on foot.



  • BharatPremi
    03-17 04:45 PM
    The recent movement in EB2 have been contributed to the spillover from EB2 ROW. That raises a question over the spill over rules. The EB2 ROW spill over should have helped EB3 ROW. But EB3 ROW is not yet C, however EB2-I moved up. If the spillover happens at the same level, then EB3-I may have hope in the future when EB3-ROW becomes C. Is such an assumption right or wrong?

    Spillover is not handled within category: It is handled from top preference to lower preference. Spillover pattern is as under. It is circular and cyclic with broken link from EB3 to EB4.

    Just for a reference read "EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES" on following bulletin link.

    http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4177.html

    So legal pattern for spillover is as under.
    --------------------------------------

    EB1 -> EB2
    EB1->EB2 -> EB3. ( This is legally defined but never happens as EB2 has a
    larger demand.)
    EB4->EB1

    Note: Nothing goes from EB3 to any category and practical reality is that
    nothing extra comes to EB3 as EB2 is always hungry:)

    In April what happened was not "really a Spillover, the loose term what we use on this board" but the use of Section "D. INDIA EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY" in the bulletin.

    USCIS found that EB2-ROW seems to be having less applicants against "total number of visas which can be granted this year" so if it does not use them then will be wasted. So USCIS again checked the database and found that EB2-India seems to be having considerable load so it decided to divert those numbers for EB2-India. USCIS can do that as per mentioned section and for such kind of awards "per country limit" is not applicable and that is perfectly legal.





    wallpaper small cross tattoos on foot. small cross tattoos. CHRISTIAN TATTOO IDEAS : CROSS
  • CHRISTIAN TATTOO IDEAS : CROSS



  • eager_immi
    01-26 10:16 AM
    I don't think you are taking a free-ride but remember only lobbying gets you what you want in this country. Yes u can feel hopeless and watch, or you can act and do something about it. There are no guaratees and but atleast you'll have no regret of having done your best. It is like saying "oh this exam is so tough i don't want to put too much effort into it since i won't pass." Remember the saying "No risk no gain."

    I (and may be lot of others like me) want to care about IV & want to contribute to IV. But there has not even a single thread of good news for last several months. This is very demotivating. I have contributed only once. Every time I visit this site, I feel guilty of taking a free ride. But at the same time I find it hard to make any contributions with nothing happening on the horizon. Currently it looks like what ever is happening or going to happen with CIR etc is just moving at its own pace. If we can not expedite it, then what is the use? in any case congress will pass some relief for skilled workers when CIR comes up.





    small cross tattoos. small cross tattoos
  • small cross tattoos



  • ca_immigrant
    01-16 06:07 PM
    I am ok so far (as far as I know), but keep worrying about what could happen...I wish I had better control over my mind and did not worry about all the things that could go wrong....I have a 3 year old and at times when I am chatting to her my mind is running all over the world thinking of all the possible things that could go wrong...

    I remember one of my friends once telling me when I told him about being worried about lay offs...he said...come on, that is like worrying about a earth quake....

    Let us hope that things improve soon !!





    2011 CHRISTIAN TATTOO IDEAS : CROSS small cross tattoos. small cross tattoos on foot.
  • small cross tattoos on foot.



  • neelu
    12-13 01:01 PM
    All , this subject has been raised very often and every time new members join in they start a thread and start questioning it.

    - IV has indepth explored and studied this option and have found that this change is not possible administratively.
    - we have not just met a lawyer. we have met few lawyers. we also have communicated with USCIS in the past.
    - In the past some administrative changes have been done by USCIS, but this change cannot be done by them. All, we already had this idea long long ago and we also thought that why dont we do it if it so simple and then we dont have to go through all the legislative hurdles. But NO it cannot be done by USCIS.
    - Faxing USCIS will not work. USCIS does not take policy decisions. We need to approach policy makers to get it done and that is what we are doing. By coming up with ideas, endlessly discussing despite explaination by IV and not working with IV action items we will all go in divergent directions and lose focus on the main action items we want each every member should focus. If you really feel for some idea and want to help, instead of asking IV to give explanation to every question on the forum, contact any of the active IV core members on the forum and bounce ideas. We need people with ideas and also same people willing to work on them too.
    - If it was possible to get it done administratively, then in the current Skil bill push we would have/ and lawmakers would also have just asked USCIS to implement it.

    Hope this explains this topic. Thanks

    Our dear Pappu,

    I understand how difficult it must be to respond to so many questions directed towards core members, and can understand how frustrating it can be to answer repetitive questions.

    So thanks for clarifying this again for many of us who thought an easy route was available (but half knew that it was there, it would have been taken).

    But can I please add that if this question has been asked repetitively, I think it warrants to be added to the "The Employment-Based Green Card: Process and Problems" section on the home page, so people can find the answer easily that searching our huge forum database. I understand that each of you are very busy and feel bad that I am adding additional work.

    Thank you.
    Neelu



    more...


    small cross tattoos. Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist
  • Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist



  • FucTheGC
    06-06 02:35 PM
    We got the "welcome" and "card production ordered" email for my wife and I today too. It was a long frustrating wait at times but I am glad its over for us now. Our best wishes to those that are still waiting.

    No RFE at any stage, straight forward case, never called them for status or infopass. Took them about 4.5 years.

    Here are our dates for those interested in tracking.

    PD: Jan 29, 2004, EB2
    Ohio labor approved - Oct 2004
    45 day letter - Jan 2005
    Labor approved from Dalla BEC - June 2006
    I I140 regular, non concurrent approved - Sept 2006
    I 485 sent to Nebraska - July 13 2007
    EAD approved - Oct 2007
    I485 approval email - June,06, 2008

    ===========

    Was your I485 Approval from Neb or Texas ?





    small cross tattoos. Lea has a small cross tattoo
  • Lea has a small cross tattoo



  • kedrex
    07-18 08:04 PM
    bump



    more...


    small cross tattoos. has a small “cross” tattoo
  • has a small “cross” tattoo



  • BharatPremi
    07-10 12:28 AM
    Whether they are smart people or not, a future department of justice investigation will find out.


    http://s202395528.onlinehome.us/category/general/

    However I see a way out for DOS/USCIS. They can avoid class action by claiming that they had warned the public in advance via the July 2 update to the July visa bulletin, and had modified the July visa bulletin only on July 6, after warning the public in advance. This way they can accept all applications received till July 5, and will be covered against any class action law suits.

    No, it will be very difficult for them to follow this as non filers or filers after 5th would come with the arguments like we were still respecting USCIS's published notice and so we did not file (non filers) and others would come up with the argument that we decided to file with having clear understanding of its rejection as filers on 5th or before did so you (USCIS) cannot discriminate merely based upon filing date.





    2010 small cross tattoos small cross tattoos. Maltese Cross Tattoos
  • Maltese Cross Tattoos



  • ashkam
    12-21 07:46 AM
    Now I am really afraid. G-325 form has section to provide last 5 jobs. Since I had a gap, I didn't provide the details for the year 2001. I am royally screwed now! :(

    G-325 does not ask for last 5 jobs, only last 5 year jobs, so you should be okay.



    more...


    small cross tattoos. Small cross tattoo wrist
  • Small cross tattoo wrist



  • nixstor
    07-05 03:00 PM
    Why would this website suddently decide to convert to a paid website? There is a link right on the top requesting funds / contributions, right? People who have resources / are willing to contribute will do it. Look at the postings of the core members who actually started this website. Did they ever make a harsh statement regarding the site visitors who have not contributed? Personally I havn't seen one yet, have you? They are very diplomatic in their efforts and thats what makes them leaders. We dont want juveniles to start dictating regulations in this forum. Lets leave these decisions to mature people who have insight in their decisions, OK. Actions taken when you are emotionally disturbed will do nothing but harm you and the rest of us. This site is and should remain a non paid. I have contributed a small amount sofar, however have found a very pleasant and enjoyable community here at the IV. I know many have contributed much more than me. Please remember that this website / core group efforts all began probably as a selfless act by a group of youngsters to benefit our legal immigrant community. Let not our emotions guide us but let reason guide us in our decisions and the best approach would be to let the core group decide. Now if they decide sternly that this can be run only as long as all the visitors/beneficieries contribute then I dont know what to say. Contributions were all voluntary and should remain voluntary. Some of those who support a paid website seem to be VERY AGITATED. If you are agitated while spending money then think twice before contributing. Dont expect everybody to do do exactly what you do.

    This is a perfect example of how an argument can be twisted and turned around. So you would prefer Pappu or 3 other members to have a funding drive for ever instead of having a constant flow of money? No one questioned the intentions of core members or people who started the website. They not only started this as a place where we can discuss issues, but also as a place where people in similar situations can come together as a community and contribute towards the cause. The contribution is both monetary and personal time. Both grass root efforts and lobbying will bring success. I personally, (who has been vocal on the thread) am not agitated that I am paying and xyz is not paying. People do not see a need to pay for IV because they are getting what they want. Every one on their heart of hearts know what kind of platform we have built here and without $$ it all means nothing. An hour before I spoke with a NPR news reporter and she asked me if I were calling on behalf of IV as soon as I explained the VB fiasco. Its our choice to support through contributions or to undermine the main agenda of the organization.

    Do not try to sell the point that we will lose membership if we make it paid, atleast to me. As I said before, people have come over to IV when hell broke loose time over time. I do not see a reason why they would stop coming. We are highly skilled but not very well endowed financially. What can we do other than lamenting about our personal choice instead of coming together as a community?





    hair small cross tattoos on foot. small cross tattoos. Small Tattoos: Small Cross
  • Small Tattoos: Small Cross



  • prioritydate
    12-20 04:12 PM
    "...I dont think you need to worry.. for you knwo what I am saying ..."

    this is turning out be very hilarious form:):). Good way to get rid of GC frustation.:o


    May be hilarious for you, not for me. You would understand the situation if you were in my shoes.



    more...


    small cross tattoos. Cross Tattoos For Women
  • Cross Tattoos For Women



  • va_labor2002
    07-24 12:38 PM
    Hi rpatel,
    I agree with your points.You are totally right. We should atleast try this channel. I think IV should address this issue to USCIS.

    I concur with the fact that manner in which the law is written/interpreted currently, its going to be an uphill task to convince the USCIS of letting us file I485 without a visa number available. Did the core group make any effort in this direction or is it their foregone conclusion that its non starter at all?

    I believe we should try to make an effort in this direction however small the chance of success may be. My reasons are following:

    1. Even if the USCIS director might not have an authority to change the procedure without congressional intervention first, the effort required to convince a congress man/ congressional committe on this issue will be smaller compared to pushing them to take up SKIL immediately.

    2. I dont know if Dept of Homeland Security might have any say in this but again we can try getting an audience with Negroponte to appraise him of the situation.

    3. Thirdly since CIR/SKIL are currently in dormant stage, coregroup/volunteers might be more open to pursuing low potential/high yield effort like this one is.





    hot Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist small cross tattoos. Human Cross tattoos designs
  • Human Cross tattoos designs



  • ashkam
    07-28 12:14 PM
    What's with all the fundies crawling out of the woodwork?

    By the way, dear fundies, if you are so against the First Amendment (freedom of speech), why are you in this country applying for a green card anyways? Because, you know, the First Amendment is kind of a big deal here.



    more...


    house small cross tattoos on foot. small cross tattoos. makeup celtic cross tattoo
  • makeup celtic cross tattoo



  • partha_vus
    10-26 11:35 AM
    PD Jan 2001(ported priority Date)
    I-140 Approed June 2007
    I485 Applied RD:July 2, 2007
    EAD cards received

    thanks





    tattoo Lea has a small cross tattoo small cross tattoos. Free Cross Tattoo Designs
  • Free Cross Tattoo Designs



  • rck4evr
    09-10 02:03 PM
    I found another link. Not sure if its the right one ?

    http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx



    more...


    pictures has a small “cross” tattoo small cross tattoos. Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist.
  • Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist.



  • vin
    06-12 02:06 PM
    I don't think they're considering the Cantwell amendment. The only amendments being considered are as below. Go to http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280993,00.html (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,280993,00.html)for complete article


    Proposed Resolution to the Standoff

    One of the proposals to overcome the impasse is to offer a limited list of Republican-sought amendments that could be considered before a final vote on the measure.

    Bill supporters say, for now, their strategy is to get a list of proposed amendments from the authors of the border security letter � Sens. Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, Mike Enzi of Wyoming, David Vitter of Louisiana, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Charles Grassley of Iowa, John Ensign of Nevada and Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

    �The details of exactly how we get from where we are now to the finish line is not something we�re prepared to announce today but I do think this bill is about 80 or 85 percent of the way through toward the finish line and we don�t have any interest in giving up on it,� Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said after meeting with the president.





    dresses Human Cross tattoos designs small cross tattoos. Cross Tattoos – Unique And
  • Cross Tattoos – Unique And



  • qasleuth
    05-26 05:16 PM
    Found this when I googled. Borderpatrol seems to have the authority to do whatever they did within 100 miles off any international border. It falls under 8 CFR 287.1. Entire state of NH is within 100 miles of Canada.


    http://www.usborderpatrol.com/Border_Patrol608_2.htm



    more...


    makeup Small cross tattoo wrist small cross tattoos. small cross tattoos on foot.
  • small cross tattoos on foot.



  • pappu
    07-02 10:36 PM
    We need to run a media drive from tomorrow with full speed so that we can communicate this absurd action by DOS and USCIS.

    How can they give 18K greencards in one day? and 60K greencards in one month. Where was the lack of manpower and heavy workload excuses?
    Why did they make the dates current in the first place when they knew they cannot handle so many applications? There are so many questions that need answers.

    This system is broken and needs to be fixed. Let us communicate to all our friends who are affected with this tragedy today so that we can all unite and make efforts to have our voices heard.

    IV release
    http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com/





    girlfriend Free Cross Tattoo Designs small cross tattoos. Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist.
  • Small Cross Tattoos On Wrist.



  • meimmi
    03-10 04:25 PM
    Yes, for e-file you need to send the supporting docs by mail. In my case, I sent the copy of I-485 ASC biometrics notice which has mention of the receipt # and A # as proof of my AOS pending, copy of I-94, copy of the e-filing confirmation (Printout). You do not need to send photo as that will be taken during fingerprinting. The separate fingerprint is needed for e-file only. They take print of 1 finger. If you send your EAD papers with I-485, the 485 fingerprnt covers all I think. I do not think we need to go for fingerprint again for EAD renewal, though with USCIS that may be possible. ;)





    hairstyles Cross Tattoos For Women small cross tattoos. Most famous small tattoos for
  • Most famous small tattoos for



  • delhirocks
    07-01 10:00 PM
    When prominent business houses like Microsoft, Google, Cisco, Oracle and organizations like AILA seem powerless when it comes to influencing senators, lawmakers and government organizations like USCIS and DOS, what can IV team do to change the policies. Sorry I did not mean to criticize, but that's the truth, unfortunately!

    What is the alternative?

    We all resign to our fate�or try to do whatever little we can





    nixstor
    07-04 09:33 PM
    [QUOTE=nixstor]Excellent analysis but it does have flaws

    I am sure you might have read this from murthy's website (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_dosebn.html) or not, but DOS/CA/VO officials shared this piece with them. As per the above article, final quarter quota should not open until Jul 2nd. I understand that agencies can implement and interpret certain stuff, but you cannot interpret and implement one thing on Jun 13th and another on Jul 2nd. If its written into law, that the quarterly allocation is a must, USCIS is in violation and DOS/CA/VO as well for not policing them of visa number usage.


    "Essentially, the numbers are spread out during the first three quarters and whatever is left is available during the last quarter"

    On reading the Murthy article it appears that the biggest mistake USCIS committed was using up the visa numbers before the 4th qtr began on 7/2/07.

    USCIS did it other way around...desparately rushed to use up the numbers before the 4th qtr began....only explanation is to avoid doing additional paperwork for the July filers...

    Its not the paper work guys. They will love the money on EAD & AP. Its the huge backlog that will remain for ever on their hump unless a recapture occurs. Due to lack of communication or what ever, DOS made every category current. The only way they can escape from accepting our applications is by using up all numbers. Thats what they essentially did. AFAIK, DOS gets updates from USCIS and CP's across the world about the number of visas they have used in the past month. DOS then prepares the VB. Assuming USCIS told DOS that they have used 80/90K for the fiscal year so far, DOS is left with 60/50K for the last quarter of the fiscal year. How can DOS imagine/understand availability of 50/60k visas to be less demand for EB categories? This is what exactly the initial July VB said and we were all stupefied. They know this in and out and a simple request for pending number of 485's from years, approved & pending 140's since retrogression hit & that do not have a adjoining 485 should come out conservatively to 150-200K. Does DOS ask this as a part of their monthly information gathering process? Yes, they does is the simple answer. Then what led to the making VB current is the esoteric Q here. USCIS will have allocated the numbers at their own pace if the VB was not made current. As the VB was made current, USCIS was forced to use all the numbers and say that there are no numbers. Unless, we hear more stuff from the offices of DOS/USCIS in response to Rep Lofgren, every thing will be speculation.





    jonty_11
    12-13 10:13 AM
    Count me and 2 more members with me....lets have a plan..and execute it.