.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

toad in hole

toad in hole. actual toad in the hole.
  • actual toad in the hole.



  • Springflower
    04-15 03:56 PM
    Enjoy the flexibility and the freedom GC provides.





    toad in hole. How To Make Toad In The Hole
  • How To Make Toad In The Hole



  • alvin
    01-18 11:01 PM
    As far as I know:
    if your E3 (approved) priority date is current for E2 (approved), you can file 485 (in E2) requesting to use the earliest (E3) priority date. From my understanding, you may be able to do it even when your E2 is pending - but it may be better to wait till you get the E2 approved. Hope it clarifies your question.





    toad in hole. Toad-in-the-hole is the
  • Toad-in-the-hole is the



  • krishnam70
    03-26 12:40 AM
    Roseball,
    This is a very good alternative that you have suggested. Does this mean that i can have my full 12+17 months of my OPT, and my H1 will only start when i do the stamping in India. But in that case i would need to have the same employer at the time i enter correct? Also what if i want to change my employer after i have my H1 stamped while coming inside the country?
    Thanks in advance.

    Comes with a risk at POE. You could be stopped and its happening to H1's too.

    - cheers
    kris





    toad in hole. Toad in the Hole
  • Toad in the Hole



  • jthomas
    01-14 12:51 PM
    i had been to SBA and the free seminars for entrepreneurs conducted by them. They hold one-one meetings and try to know what you exactly want to do and tell you how to proceed. It is an goverment organization with volunteers who are reteired high ranking officers from different field. They gave me brochures and booklets and told me to write a business plan. Anyway, you can google SBA and find the nearest local office and ask them for a appointment.



    more...


    toad in hole. A male and female woodpecker
  • A male and female woodpecker



  • sparky_jones
    03-23 03:12 PM
    bump





    toad in hole. Toad in the Hole
  • Toad in the Hole



  • sidbee
    10-26 04:21 PM
    I have travelled on Lufthanza several times with stopover at Frankfort. My parents who have a visitor visa to US travelled on Air France with stopover at Paris. In both cases, there was no need for any transit visa. As a general rule, you need a visa only if you are leaving the airport at the stopover Hub.

    This is totally wrong information.

    If you are not sure , please don't post with confidence. The OP would have been screwed if he had used Air France.

    If you don't have a valid US Visa stamped in the passport (IE working in the US on AP, Approved 797), you cant transit via UK,FRANCE, without a transit visa.



    more...


    toad in hole. cheesy toad in a hole sandwich
  • cheesy toad in a hole sandwich



  • greyhair
    03-13 12:30 PM
    Graham is only opposed to the dems passing Healthcare reform through reconcilliation method, which is ramming through Senate with just 51 votes without regard to any republican inputs or support. It's only that the dems are not listening to repubs suggestions on a very important piece of legislation.

    Are you sure democrats are not listening to republican suggestions? Healthcare debate has been going on for over 1 year. In my 8 years in US, never has been so much time given to debate any single issue. Most of the key provisions in the bill were Republican ideas including tax cuts, coverage for preexisting condition etc. Republicans are taking bribes from insurance companies for stalling the healthcare bill. If democrats did not want to include republicans then they could have passed healthcare bill last year when democrats had super majority in the Senate, before Scott Brown's election. All throughout last year democrats have been trying to get republicans on board. Republican party have stalled the entire government. Now with no other choice, after debating healthcare for more than 1 year, republicans want to restart the entire discussion. This is appalling.

    Keeping all tradition, Healthcare bill passed with with filibuster proof majority in the Senate. House passed their own bill with majority. House is now trying to pass Senate bill. Then House and Senate will do reconciliation of the House bill and Senate bill in the conference committee. Every bill has to go through conference committee. After conference committee they will again pass the final bill in the House and the Senate with majority vote. What is wrong with this process? Every republican senator was elected with 50% majority. No one asked republican senators to prove 60% vote. Why can't the Senate pass a bill with 51 votes after passing through the filibuster test of 60 votes when that is how others bills pass? So many large bills including Patriot act were passed with 50 Senate votes + 1 vote of Dick Cheney after the conference committee.

    There was no immigration bill last year because of healthcare debate. Republican party is a party of no and they don't want to see anything done.





    toad in hole. Toad in the Hole
  • Toad in the Hole



  • dilipb
    01-31 03:48 PM
    LUD is still showing some 11/28/2007 date



    more...


    toad in hole. toad in the hole 2
  • toad in the hole 2



  • factoryman
    07-02 02:29 AM
    IV is so diverse, and mostly anonymous. Quoting one of the greatest persons in history is fine in theroy. But please practice it.

    First and formost, don't become 'touch me not' and withdraw. I am sure you will. Taking umbrage against posts shouldn't turn oneself off, if service, sharing and co-operation is the driving motive.

    I have seen much water flown under the bridge, here at IV, at work and in personal life. We are all here for the avoidable 'injustices' going on against EB based folks: in visa stamping to AOS.

    The whole gamut. Let's say - if most are are turned off (however personal it may be), there is no zest, no life; a place is Sahara, Thar or Gobi would be a perfect place.

    Hope you will take in the right spirit. Got to go. Reaaly going to get unhooked from IV for today.

    yadadaba, i have posted my email in many places. If you want to get info, please email me directly in the future. I will share what I know - IV folks ridiculed me when I said my info from the Ombudsman's office was true. They simply don't want people who have a slightly variant info to raise a voice. I have not personally heard from the O's office on this as I sent my application out on Friday for a Monday delivery without any knowledge of such possibility. If it happens it will really stink...to those who call Ombudsman the barking dog - think before you say - he may have just saved us from loosing 40K visas. Possibly the dates were made current only to clear pre-adjudicated cases. And if thats true, guess what? A window will open again in October. Thats better than where we were without the O's report that may have not impacted anything and the 40K cases ahead of us would still be pending. Its in our greater interest that they get approved and we move up the ladder versus we trying to cry wolf. My 2 cents...


    Something to ponder: "Gandhi's peace marches did not get Independence to India alone. They were radical movements of many people behind it equally responsible if not more. IVs movement is the peaceful one - important but not enough and definitely not filled with exclusivity"





    toad in hole. Toad of Toad Hall.
  • Toad of Toad Hall.



  • immigrant-in-law
    04-24 08:50 AM
    The same happened in my case. Got informed by the lawyer yesterday that my wife's 485 has an RFE and that USCIS has asked for a copy of marriage cert and some pictures of the ceremony/celebrations etc. I do remember sending them this stuff when we initially filed 485.

    My lawyer just informed me that I received an RFE on my wife's 485
    USCIS is asking for "Memorandum of marriage"
    Is it the same as Marriage certificate. I have already send the marriage certificate which states that the marriage has been registered under Hindu marriage registration rules. My name as well as my wifes name and date of amrriage is there.

    Why do they need this additional proof Not sure. Has anyone faced this RFE?
    Looks like some crazy guys are working in USCIS hell bent on harassing legal immigrants.
    I have been given just four weeks to respond.



    more...


    toad in hole. Toad in the Hole
  • Toad in the Hole



  • werc
    03-28 03:22 PM
    So a person on H1B goes onto a H4 and wants to come back onto a H1B 3 months down the line. As per your statement , the person is subjected to the cap. Was that what you were implying ?

    I think you were referring to this in the link.

    b) Persons who have previously been counted against the H1B quota (a person would only be counted once against the cap unless s/he has a year outside the U.S., thereby resetting the clock on the six-year limit.)

    I understand this to mean that aperson who has spent a year outside the US has 2 options.

    1. To apply for a new H1 (subject to the cap)
    2. To use the remainder of the 6 years he has from his prior H1B.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.


    If you don't have 1 year gap. otherwise you are subjected to.





    toad in hole. Toad in the hole in 4 easy
  • Toad in the hole in 4 easy



  • ngopikrishnan
    06-07 10:13 PM
    Can anyone please comment on Massachusetts licensing requirements? and the validity period for someone who is working on EAD? Thanks!



    more...


    toad in hole. Cut a 3-in. hole in the middle
  • Cut a 3-in. hole in the middle



  • vxb2004
    04-28 09:21 PM
    I guess employer need to revoke unused H1Bs as part of H1B rules. Maybe that is the reason employer revoked past H1Bs to keep their side clean.

    I remember reading Murthy bullettin where she mentioned back-wages are an issue if H1B is not explicitly revoked.

    My guess.

    My previous attorney also mentioned the same thing. Looking at this thread it seems all soft/hard lud's were generated on Sunday, April 26th. Maybe a computer program flagged these cases.





    toad in hole. Upmarket Toad in the Hole with
  • Upmarket Toad in the Hole with



  • senthil1
    04-08 02:15 AM
    I think all the issue will be resolved if number 5 is done. No need for H1 extension, and even there is a in efficiency in USCIS you can get gc within 3 years if they double or triple EB quota. So no need to meet President just meet Congressmen and try pressing them to increase EB quota.

    Can we get an appointment with the President and explain the problems faced by EB immigrants....

    1. Travel restrictions (no travel during H1 extension etc..)
    2. Driver license issues
    3. Wasted Visa numbers
    4. Inefficiency of USCIS
    5. Need to increase EB quota

    I know that law makers should make these changes, but President has a strong voice and if he hears our pathetic position, he may do something, just a hope :rolleyes:



    more...


    toad in hole. like #39;Toad in the Hole#39;
  • like #39;Toad in the Hole#39;



  • sweet_jungle
    10-06 12:08 AM
    I am also interested in this topic. My wife is working curently using OPT. But, she is waiting for EAD also. So, once 485 EAD comes, she will be in similar situation.
    Lawyer has suggested using 485 EAD once it comes.
    Anyway, for travelling, AP has to be used. Once you travel on AP and come back, you cannot continue working using OPT. You have to use 485 EAD. So, it is better to switch to 485 EAD to avoid confusion.
    I am planning to keep her on OPT till Dec 31. It will make our tax filing easier next year. From January, she can switch to 485 EAD and pay social security tax.
    Let me know if you can some concrete info on this.

    Is it possible that we get cuaght by IRS audit since I wonder how safe it is to NOT pay social security tax after you have filed 485? I was reading the other thread about IRS audit and am a bit worried.





    toad in hole. Toad-in-a-Hole Pizza
  • Toad-in-a-Hole Pizza



  • sandy_77
    06-20 11:51 AM
    I would like to appeal to all the people who want to travel outside the country and would need a new visa stamp to come back to US....please...please...please do not take this risk unless it is a family emergency (a life and death situation rather than a brother,sister getting married). Per the new rules all of us have to pass through many checks (such as PIMS, NAME CHECK, SECURITY CLEARANCE, ETC.). Contrary to popular belief PIMS is the simplest of all. You will possibly get a PIMS clearance within a month (usually 5 days). However, if you get stuck because of other checks, only God can help you. People (more than a couple of thousand at any given time during these days) are stuck at the consulates in India for two months or more (these days waiting time exceeds 4 months in normal cases and I am one of them). Some guys have been given visas after 1.5 years. Also, contrary to what most lawyers would have you believe that only those people get stuck who have done something wrong, I can assure you that there are very few cases (possibly less than a 5% of the total) who have been outright rejected even after significant delays for security clearances. These lawyers have just surrendered before the DOS/DHS...possibly avoiding burning bridges with the government rather than protecting human rights and civil liberties. God forbid if you get stuck for reasons other than PIMS, anything you can ever know from consulate/DOS after that is that your case is pending in "additional administrative processing" for security clearance. No more no less and you probably have no right to demand transparency. Not even your local congressman/senator can save you then from the harassment that the DOS thinks you deserve for being a third world citizen.
    Sorry for being so brazen but I am tired of all these travel related questions. Somehow I think some of like to challenge the consulate/DOS OR our luck (like I did...but I didn't even know that there is a best like AAP out there waiting for me...of course ignorance is not an excuse either).



    more...


    toad in hole. But why is it called Toad In
  • But why is it called Toad In



  • chanduv23
    06-19 12:23 PM
    Wow! Thank you everyone for your input!

    So how does one surrender a Green Card abroad - do they have to go to a US Consular Office/Embassy?

    Yes, my dad took his expired GC to the Chennai Consulate when he went for his visitor's visa stamping and let the first level screening officer know that he has this document - she then made a note of it (I think) and asked my dad to hand it over the VO during the interview. When my dad handed it to the VO - he was looking and gazing at it for a while and then took it inside and had a small discussion with a couple of people and then filled out a form and had a notary notorize it and asked my dad to fill out the form and gave my dad a copy and then put it in an envelope and attached this to my dad's visitor's visa file.





    toad in hole. Toad in the Hole with Onion
  • Toad in the Hole with Onion



  • 53885
    08-16 07:20 PM
    According to the EAD, she can work. She has TIN number, but I am not sure if she can use that...

    TIN is not SSN. Employer would need SSN.

    I guess we need another tracker for those who received EAD, but no SSN.





    toad in hole. 20110131-135455-toad-in-a-hole
  • 20110131-135455-toad-in-a-hole



  • h1techSlave
    04-09 09:53 PM
    While listing the house the seller signs an agreement with the agent that they would go thru that agent. So directly dealing with the seller may not be an option. Now, there are home selling agencies who charges a fixed amount ($3000). And some times the seller tries to sell the house directly; in that case they would not be able to list the house in the MLS. Hence many sellers do not go this route.

    and the seller basically prices it into the sale price... which why when buying next time .. i would ask to deal with the seller directly.. get an attorney to do the paperwork and diligence for $600 and ask the seller to keep 1% and give me a 5% discount.lil leg work and you save like 25k on 500k house.





    kirupa
    03-28 03:42 AM
    I just had a response back from the MSDN boards that I need to hit test to find out which UI Element is being clicked. I will explore this route and will hopefully find an answer to post here.
    In the event handler for the UI element you click, simply do a cast such as "sender as UIElement". That will give you a reference to the element you are trying to find.

    :thumb:





    franklin
    07-17 06:10 PM
    I don't want to sound like a broken record, but please contribute!

    Talk is cheap guys, put your money where your mouth is so we can continue fighting for us all! The battle is won, the war is far from over.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=25#HowToContribute

    :D